Back Soon

By: Scott Cranin
In-House Review - Oct 22 2007

Crisply told and delving into areas we've never seen examined in film before, Rob Williams' Back Soon is a remarkable step-up from his first endeavor Long-Term Relationship. Using the same two lead actors, Williams story casts a cinematic spell from the moment the film begins. Logan (Beacham) is recovering from the death of his wife when he meets Gil (Montgomery). The two men hit it off immediately, and they both know it's not just friendship. After a night that ends up in the sack, the two men become physically aware of their attraction to one another. Both men identify as straight, but for some reason, they are very hot for each other. As their relationship develops, the two men realize that powers from the other side are having an influence on their lives. Friends and family are shocked at the two new lovers, some are supportive when the facts are revealed, some are most decidedly not. All is well until Gil reveals his sordid past and events spin out of control.
With fine acting from both Matthew Montgomery (Gone, but Not Forgotten and Socket) and Windham Beacham, Williams' new film is anchored in solid rock. The story is golden and the film very captivating.

By: Urbangruv

I have long loved Matthew Montgomery. He is talented and sexy without being typically handsome or a nautilus body. The two leads have great chemistry and you route for them even though you know there is someone between them. You are left hoping that things really work out for them in the end.

By: chromo.man

While I have long been a big Matthew Montgomery fan, even I have to admit that this film is not recommendable. The 2 starring actors -- who I am sure can do better -- appear wooden, and not in the way you might like. ( And don't get me started on how bad some of the supporting actors were! ) The plot's premise is unusual, and could certainly have been developed into a more satisfying film than this Poorly directed, with some silly continuity inconsistencies in the plot, and a monotone, unemotional feel throughout: this film can be skipped, even by other MM fans.

By: Amos Lassen

"Back Soon"
Looking at Love
Amos Lassen
Rob Williams who gave us that wonderful film "Long Term Relationship" has just completed his new movie "Back Soon" and it was worth waiting for. "Back Soon" is a different kind of film than Williams's first but it is wonderful in its difference. It is a love story and one that you would not expect.
Logan Foster, an aspiring film director, meets Gil Ramirez at a party and despite their different backgrounds they are mysteriously drawn to one another. What makes this all the more interesting is that both guys are straight. The connection is indeed magical but of course there is a twist. There is something in Gil's past which threatens the relationship they have and suddenly we are let in on a surprise which deals with the question of the real nature of their relationship. Sound mysterious? It had me take a seat, lean back and follow a plot that did not fail to keep me interested-to say the least.
"Back Soon" has to be classified as a romantic comedy and it is indeed romantic and a comedy. Everything about it is good. The cinematography is beautiful, the actors play their parts perfectly, the script is literate and believable and the direction is excellent.

By: Spico

By: PD

Woops... I noticed my final draft in word did not get pasted over my first draft from 1/7/10 correctly. This was to be at the beginning so it is fine to read this first. The story is about two straight men-Logan and Gill-who meet when Logan is selling his house after his wife dies. They feel a connection and are strangely drawn to each other. Gill buys the house from Logan but through circumstances unplanned they both end up back at the house one night. Not to tell it all I will cut to it. They unexpectedly end up in the same room and see a spark. They go for it and from there a dating relationship begins. They admit they are straight and are not drawn to any other men-much like the beginning of my relationship with my partner. They later realize they were drawn together because of a spiritual connection and later that connection is broken. The questions are then posed: Was it only the spiritual connection that drew us? Would we have been drawn otherwise? Aside from that, now that we are here and we have recognized that we can share love together do we continue? The last line in the movie is where Logan asked Gill if he would like to go out for coffee or something and Gill answered, I would like that. One of my favorite lines in life is from this movie where Logan gave his I have always lived my life in perfect little boxes speech and he uses labels to describe his life before his first romantic encounter with Gill. He says it is so easy to put people in their own little categories based on who they are and what they have done... but what if things change? What if you find yourself outside the box you tried so hard to be in. This was the tie in to what I shared and it is my final note. Do not label life so harshly, rejecting all that is not like you. Recognize "love". Sex is about self indulgent release... it's okay if that is all either person wants. Relationships, however, are about intimacy and pleasing your partner. Love is out there, so be patient and do not be so ridged when love finds you.

By: PD

Like others who reviewed this film a sequel would be nice but to me there was no question that they would continue a relationship. They had feelings for each other and that was more important than the stereotypical views of what straight and gay relationships are supposed to be like. The point that was trying to be made was what warmed my heart and hit home for me. If one had to label me I would be considered bisexual and so would my partner. Yet in our eyes we do not see ourselves as gay or bisexual. We have both been married, my partner twice and my self once. We both have two children; he has one from each marriage. Even more odd than that we are... hold your breath... Christians. We are not at all stereotypical and that was what I liked about the point of this film. My partner and I do not promote a gay or straight lifestyle. To us it is not about being gay, straight or bisexual. We simply live and enjoy the love we have found. We were single, we met, we felt chemistry, we got together and this year will be our 8th anniversary. I did not grow up with a desire to be with men and I am not with my partner because I have a strong desire to be with men. We are together by choice, and yes, we are more attracted to women than to men. It is our commitment to each other and the love we have for each other that keeps us together. It just happened and we are crazy in love. Oddly enough we both agree that our love for each other is not to the same degree-not as strong-as we had for our ex-wifes. (In case you are wondering; they left us and it was not because of any gay tendencies we had. They were just spoiled.) So for me it is that connection to love regardless of what is expected that made it a feel good movie for me. For me that is what it should be about. I have been around thousands, yes thousands of gay men and women and there is no stereotype. Those who say there is live a sheltered life that is limited to small groups of guys and gals just like them. I have seen a lot of guys fall into what is considered the "gay" stereotype simply because they do not know who they are and follow the crowd. Six months after I was at my current place of employment I took my partner to the Christmas party. Everyone was shocked to learn I was not "straight"-their words not mine. It was not because I act one way in front of gay people and another in front of straight people. I am myself and it male. Is it easier for me to find attraction in the male physic now that I have a same sex partner? Yes it is. But I still have my preference and if I were single my first choice would be to date women. So to me the point in this movie to its simplest degree was very valid and plausible and I can tell you there are more guys like me than you may think. The problem is most people are scared of it which makes a lot of guys afraid to admit it. You try going to a gay bar and tell a guy you are bisexual-the only term they could understand in my case. They are afraid of committing to you for fear you will run off with a woman and vise versa with telling a woman. So it is easier for a lot of guys who are single to say they are gay. Then there are those who criticize you because you were with a woman and act like you have cooties and then disrespect the female gender by calling them a fish. We complain about being bashed but I have heard more gay bashing from gay people than I have from straight. Everyone is hung up on whether they are born this way or not and they can not deal with men like me who say it was my choice that put me in this relationship. Too many guys have something to prove and it is primarily because they are afraid of what others will say and do and they have trouble accepting themself and their own choice. Do I understand that. Of course I do. We all want to be accepted and loved. But we have to love ourself first. So okay, I would not agree with the spiritual concept of how they got together, but it is fiction. For me the point of getting them together and their ultimate decision to build on the feelings they have for one another is more important than how they got there. They admitted they cared for each other and felt good together and that was enough reason not to throw away what they had and start fresh. So the acting leaves something to be desired and there was not a belaievable or great performance from all of the supporting actors... but lets be honest. The "gay" film industry makes most of its money on porn... and talk about bad acting? The industry does not have a lot of support from backers looking to promote the "lifestyle" in a decent film, so what do we expect. Gay films and acting is getting better as the money increases and until then we should be glad for what we have. You think you could do better without backers then make your own film. I wonder if those who continually slam movies and toss them aside solely based on the acting like I see in a lot of reviews are the same people, who have nothing better to do than slam one another, make negative comments about ones weight, looks, job and attire; ultimately rejecting what could have been a wonderful relationship. Where would I be if I had said to my partner, I feel chemistry between us but you are a guy so I can not date you? I am better off because instead of just talking about ideals of love and how we should threat each other I actually live by them. My partner and I do not have the same taste in everything. Sometimes he gets me a gift that I would not choose for myself. At that moment I have a choice. Do I make a big deal about it and say if you loved me you would know my taste? Is that going to encourage him or lift him up? Do I cherish the gift or the giver? Diamonds may be a girl's best friend but I can't have a meaningful relationship with them. On a scale of 5 stars: For the acting I give it 3 1/2 stars (a balance of the stars, and bit players). For the message I give it 5 stars. For the entertainment value I give it 4 1/2 stars.

By: Cory

Sorry, I just might be one of those gay movie watchers who cannot figure out what is all this praise for Matthew Montgomery. Quite frankly I do not find him appealing in any capacity, neither with looks nor talent. Gay movie actors do not have to be drop dead gorgeous. Average looks will suffice if the acting and talent are there but in this case all of that is missing. I do not understand why I cannot see it in this actor after he receives all this praise.

By: two4699

This was truly a nice movie, it presented an interesting twist to the gay genre. The acting was OK, not great, yet in some parts convincing, and even touching. It seemed to be a bit sluggish in parts, surreal in others, but overall quite nice.
I only hope that Rob Williams will somehow provide stronger directorial skills to evoke more passion, and believeability not only from his storylines, but his actors.

By: gengida

By: mark4443

This is a good solid movie. Unique and interesting storyline. While the acting will not win any awards, it is quite competent. The two leads do a good job in bringing their characters to life. Montgomery, in particular, is very effective in making his character believable, This may be Montgomery's best performance to date.

By: JANORM

This is a melodrama with gay over tones that has very spiritual complications! The story has some very unusual twists which give the audience not only the ability at thought provoking but also a sense of pleasure. This film is so sur-real at times that I have had to view it on many occations. The actors are to highly commened on their characterizations. THE EMOTION OF LOVE HAS STRUCK WITH AN ENTIRELY NEW RANGE!!!

By: Conner

Both Matthew & Windham did an excellent acting job, as usual. I hope that they will do another movie together again, as they work well toegther.

I thought, Windham, brought out his sorrow & pain for his dead wife, beautifully. Several times, I had tears in my eyes, as I watched him grieve, along with make the difficult decision, to move on without her.

Being a "huge" Montgomery fan. I could find no fault in Matthew's acting. Seriously speaking, though. Matthew, as usuaual, brought out his character beautifully. I just love the guys talent.

I did feel, that the plot was a little far fetched. As well, I also felt that the ending could have been better, as it left one wondering, what happened here? Think....complete memory loss on Windham part???? So, I feel that the movie appeared to have ended as a cliff hanger.

So, the obvious question is.....Will there be a sequel? Probably not.

I, myself would like to see a sequel, with both guys living happily ever after.

By: David_Rhode_Island

Director Rob Williams did a great job with the two leads, but no direction on earth could have helped the other characters in the show, who were just awful. Looking that the picture of the cover of the DVD, the boy on the left is suffering from the loss of his wife and has decided to sell their house (too many memories), and the boy on the right shows up to buy the house. SLIGHT SPOILER AHEAD IN THIS REVIEW: What brings these two together involves an element of the supernatural, a premise that may be too silly for some people. The interesting result, though, is a basis for a love to develop between these two "straight men" that results in a very well done exploration of love transcending gender. Overall, the movie was fine for entertaining a room full of forty-something friends of mine, but it wasn't amazing (comparing apples to oranges, we'd think Beautiful Thing, My Own Private Idaho, Later Days,Trick, and stuff like that were examples of amazing films, just to give you an idea). I would love to see a part 2 that explored more of the relationship possibilities between two straight men. Still, if you're wondering if it's worth the price for a movie to share with friends? Sure.

By: peterp88

I expected to see Windom full frontal. No one, even Matthew showed any thing. The story line was terrible. I hope that Matthew and Windham make better movies together. I will buy anything with either in then movies with a gay theme but not like this.